Government of Maharashtra is in the state of fix over the interview of former Mumbai Commissioner of Police Hasan Gafoor published by The Week in which he is believed to said that four top ranking IPS officers from the State Police shirked their duties on the fateful night of 26/11, which was the most horrendous night to have been experienced by any city in the world.
Parambir Singh, who is currently discharging his duties as DIG Konkan @ Thane Range who is named by Gafoor as one of the four IPS officers, who had allegedly lagged on terror night, has threatened to initiate a legal action against Gafoor, Deven Bharati too on his part has taken pains to explain his whereabouts on the dreadful night to the media, in his attempt to negate Gafoor’s proposition.
No sooner Gafoor’s charges were carried by the media on Saturday 21st November, both CM and Home Minister R R Patil were quick to summon both Gafoor and KL Prasad to know what had actually transpired.
The political aftermath of 26/11 was so much so that both the then CM Vilasrao Deshmukh and Deputy CM R R Patil were required to put down their papers, over the public outcry, as the inefficiency of both the Mumbai Police state and intelligence wing came to the fore.
To quell the public anger, the then newly sworn in CM Ashok Chavan promptly announced the formation of Ram Pradhan – V. Balachandran Committee to find out the role of the police personnel for those three crucial days. However, quietly strangely, till this date, the terms of reference of Pradhan Committee have never been made public.
Though couple of public interest litigations were filed in the Bombay High Court for fixing the responsibility on the erring government officials for the dereliction of their duties, the Government got the boost, as the Apex court has granted a ‘stay’ for making Pradhan committee report public, when the matter reached to Delhi. So everything is under the wraps and no body knows who are the officers who have been indicted by the committee and who are the ones, to whom a clean chit has been given.
In the light of fresh bomb shell dropped by Ex Mumbai CP, it is interesting to note, wheat Gafoor has deposed before the committee and whether he had castigated any such aspersions on the erring officers, when he had ample opportunity to air so. If he has not, then Gafoor is inviting a trouble for himself.
Though the media has carried reports, that Government was furious over Gafoor’s interview, which has been given to the weekly publication in contrast to Civil Service Rules, it needs to be seen, whether Government gives him an opportunity to argue his side, as a principle of natural justice.
One would recollect that few weeks after the blast, Gafoor had categorically stated during the press conference about the involvement of ‘local elements’ in 26/ 11 attacks and was quick to backtrack when he was presumably admonished by Delhi over his revelation.
This time too, Gafoor has backtracked and has now tried to shift the onus on the publication.
One must remember that The Week publication belonging Malayalam Manorama group is India’s highly respected publication and is never known to have indulged in any kind of yellow journalism, or scandalous writing or scoops, or defamatory campaign while targeting anyone, etc. or taking any kind of soopari on behalf of some against his rival, in order to boost its circulation figure, since its inception.
Hence, unless Gafoor proves that all that The Week has carried is false and imaginary, the revelation published by the The Week needs to be believed and be taken seriously.
Given the sensitivity of the issue, when the matter was being published on the 1st anniversary of 26/11, its reporter must have carried minimum an audio tape recorder, if not video recorder, while conducting Gafoor’s interview. If its reporter has taped so, then Gafoor has no chance to show that the weekly magazine has twisted his statements.
Be that as it may, the government must show the courage to enquire and find out, whether all that Gafoor has now said about the dereliction of duties of four IPS officers in question is true or otherwise !
But the moot question, is when the government of the day, does not show the courage in making 26/11 Pradhan committee report public, will it dare to ask the duo of Pradhan – Balachandran to have a second round of enquiry in the fresh set of allegations made by Gafoor? Or else, Gafoor would be made a scapegoat and he would be fired from the service for talking to the media and deingrating the image of the police department, which he once held as numero uno.
One feels that India’s democracy is a superficial democracy. In US, the Bush administration was quick to constitute an enquiry over 9 /11 attacks, which was made its findings public, after the report was laid down before the Congress. However, in India, 26/11 report is wrapped in a secrecy. ! Two tales of world’s biggest democracies !